Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable

On Thursday 19 July 2007 10:22, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Wow, that's a really cool bug; nice work!  Don't forget to update
> > arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/state.c, though; it uses setCx86() as well.  It
> > needs to include processor-cyrix.h.
>
> It also needs some big fat comments

No problem. Where to add?

Juergen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: TAKADA Yoshihito <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Andres Salomon <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]