Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable

On Thursday 19 July 2007 10:52:48 Juergen Beisert wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2007 10:22, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Wow, that's a really cool bug; nice work!  Don't forget to update
> > > arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mtrr/state.c, though; it uses setCx86() as well.  It
> > > needs to include processor-cyrix.h.
> >
> > It also needs some big fat comments
> 
> No problem. Where to add?

Where the inlines are defined.

Also can you please resubmit full patches with full description
and Signed off lines, not incrementals? Thanks.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
  - From: Juergen Beisert <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
  - From: TAKADA Yoshihito <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
  - From: Juergen Beisert <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] - Increase PNP_MAX_PORT. ACPI devices can have a lot IO resource declarations
Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/3] ps3: Disk Storage Driver
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i386: Geode's TSC is not neccessary to mark tu unstable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]