Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19

* Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> wrote:

> > ah! It passes in a low-res time source into a high-res time 
> > interface (pthread_cond_timedwait()). Could you change the 
> > time(NULL) + 1 to time(NULL) + 2, or change it to:
> > 
> > 	gettimeofday(&wait, NULL);
> > 	wait.tv_sec++;
> 
> This is wrong. It's wrong for two reasons:
> 
>  - it really shouldn't be needed. I don't think "time()" has to be 
>    *exactly* in sync, but I don't think it can be off by a third of a 
>    second or whatever (as the "30% CPU load" would seem to imply)
> 
>  - gettimeofday works on a timeval, pthread_cond_timedwait() works on a 
>    timespec.

ah, i didnt notice that automount mixed up timespec with timeval! That 
is nasty and the tv_nsec field (which really is ts_usec to 
pthread_cond_timewait()) must stay cleared - or rather, to avoid bugs of 
this type, a timespec variable should be used for all this.

> So if it actually makes a difference, it makes a difference for the 
> *wrong* reason: the time is still totally nonsensical in the tv_nsec 
> field (because it actually got filled in with msecs!), but now the 
> tv_sec field is in sync, so it hides the bug.
> 
> Anyway, hopefully the patch below might help. But we probably should make 
> this whole thing a much more generic routine (ie we have our internal 
> "getnstimeofday()" that still is missing the second-overflow logic, and 
> that is quite possibly the one that triggers the "30% off" behaviour).

yeah, i'll generalize it, but our internal getnstimeofday() used on most 
architectures is using __get_realtime_clock_ns(), and the patch you 
attached already adds the second-overflow logic to it.

there are two versions of getnstimeofday(), a TIME_INTERPOLATION one and 
a !TIME_INTERPOLATION one. TIME_INTERPOLATION is only used on ia64 at 
the moment - and that one indeed does not have the second overflow 
logic.

> Ingo, I'd suggest:
>  - ger rid of "timespec_add_ns()", or at least make it return a return 
>    value for when it overflows.
>  - make all the people who overflow into tv_sec call a "fix_up_seconds()" 
>    thing that does the xtime overflow handling.

ok, i'll do something clean.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: libata [ata_piix] still no resume from S3 ?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]