On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:33 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 July 2007 02:21:14 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 09:49 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Monday 16 July 2007 08:21:07 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > > > PNP0C02 devices normally have a lot more IO port declarations than
> > > > currently defined in PNP_MAX_PORT
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > >
> > > > I also wonder whether other limits like:
> > > > #define PNP_MAX_MEM 4
> > > > #define PNP_MAX_IRQ 2
> > > > #define PNP_MAX_DMA 2
> > > > could get exceeded with pnpacpi?
> > >
> > > Definitely. I think the current limits come from the PNP ISA spec
> > > (sec 4.6). I don't see similar limits in the PNPBIOS or ACPI specs,
> > > so ideally I think they should be dynamically allocated as you suggest.
> > >
> > I wanted to implement the dynamic approach and used a dynamically
> > allocated array, filled up from beginning. While this is close to the
> > current implementation I thought this is the easiest sufficient way...
> > (I also only did this for io ports where most mem is wasted).
> > Now I am thinking about hotplug (e.g. if a SSDT with resources gets
> > hot-added, removed)... If a device can vanish, the array must get
> > reordered, not a really well fitting structure, a list (a pnp specific
> > set up, or from include/linux/list.h?) should be better?
>
> I don't understand the array reordering problem. Either a device exists
> or it doesn't. Loading or unloading an SSDT should not change the number
> of resources for devices (except that it might add or remove an entire
> device).
Yes, you are right. I feared there could be cases were single resources
should be able to be removed.
>
> I think for now, it would be sufficient to increase PNP_MAX_IRQ to 8
> and PNP_MAX_PORT to 32 and be done with it. I don't think it's worth
> getting more complicated unless we dynamically allocate everything.
Ok.
Thanks,
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
