Hi, On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > The only expectation is that a process with a lower nice level gets more > time. Any other expectation is a bug. Yes, users are buggy, they expect a lot of stupid things... Is this really reason enough to break this? What exactly is the damage if setpriority() accepts a few more levels? bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: James Bruce <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: fix sysfs root inode nlink accounting
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: make sysfs_init_inode() static
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
- Index(es):
 |