Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:22:34PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> However, the currently (i386-derived) x86-64 ones are suboptimal.  The

In what way are they suboptimal? 

They seem to work just fine.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
  - From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]