Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:22:34PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> However, the currently (i386-derived) x86-64 ones are suboptimal.  The

In what way are they suboptimal? 

They seem to work just fine.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]