Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:27:41AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:19 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> > > +#define GET_CONTENTS(desc)	(((desc)->raw32.b >> 10) & 3)
> > > +#define GET_WRITABLE(desc)	(((desc)->raw32.b >>  9) & 1)
> > 
> > You got rid of the duplicate definitions here, but then added new 
> > duplicates (GET_CONTENTS / WRITABLE).  Can you stick them in desc.h?
> 
> To be honest, I got sick of counting bits at this point, and didn't want
> to introduce bugs.

Where is 1/ and 3/ ?

I got an older version of this patch queued now

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h
    • From: Zachary Amsden <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [git patches] two warning fixes
• Next by Date: [git patches] net driver updates
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]