Re: [PATCH 2/3] i386: use x86_64's desc_def.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 09:27:41AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 09:19 -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> > > +#define GET_CONTENTS(desc)	(((desc)->raw32.b >> 10) & 3)
> > > +#define GET_WRITABLE(desc)	(((desc)->raw32.b >>  9) & 1)
> > 
> > You got rid of the duplicate definitions here, but then added new 
> > duplicates (GET_CONTENTS / WRITABLE).  Can you stick them in desc.h?
> 
> To be honest, I got sick of counting bits at this point, and didn't want
> to introduce bugs.

Where is 1/ and 3/ ?

I got an older version of this patch queued now

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux