Re: [PATCH] vmalloc_32 should use GFP_KERNEL

On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 23:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> whoops, yes.
> 
> Are those errors serious and common enough for 2.6.22.x?  

No idea, so far, the nouveau DRM isn't something I would recommend to
people to use in stable environments but heh... I don't know who else
uses vmalloc_32.

Cheers,
Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] vmalloc_32 should use GFP_KERNEL
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] vmalloc_32 should use GFP_KERNEL
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] vmalloc_32 should use GFP_KERNEL
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
• Next by Date: Re: [ofa-general] Further 2.6.23 merge plans...
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] vmalloc_32 should use GFP_KERNEL
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] vmalloc_32 should use GFP_KERNEL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]