[PATCH] vmalloc_32 should use GFP_KERNEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've noticed lots of failures of vmalloc_32 on machines where it
shouldn't have failed unless it was doing an atomic operation.

Looking closely, I noticed that:

#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32)
#define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_DMA32
#elif defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)
#define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_DMA
#else
#define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_KERNEL
#endif

Which seems to be incorrect, it should always -or- in the DMA flags
on top of GFP_KERNEL, thus this patch.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
---

This fixes frequent errors launchin X with the nouveau DRM for example.

Index: linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-work.orig/mm/vmalloc.c	2007-07-18 16:22:00.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-work/mm/vmalloc.c	2007-07-18 16:22:11.000000000 +1000
@@ -578,9 +578,9 @@ void *vmalloc_exec(unsigned long size)
 }
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32)
-#define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_DMA32
+#define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_DMA32 | GFP_KERNEL
 #elif defined(CONFIG_64BIT) && defined(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)
-#define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_DMA
+#define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL
 #else
 #define GFP_VMALLOC32 GFP_KERNEL
 #endif


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux