Re: Linux 2.6.22 released

On 11/07/07 23:16, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I just checked with today's gcc 4.2 (070711) freshly compiled and from a quick inspection 
> the code looks correct again. So perhaps it has been already fixed? 

It has indeed been fixed.  I tracked the bug down to gcc svn revision 126418
 (20070706) and the fix to revision 126487 (20070709).

Best wishes,

-- 
Martin Orr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• References:
  • Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Martin Orr <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Martin Orr <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: new 2.6.22-git5 warnings
• Next by Date: [BUG] AS io-scheduler.
• Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
• Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]