On 11/07/07 23:16, Andi Kleen wrote: > I just checked with today's gcc 4.2 (070711) freshly compiled and from a quick inspection > the code looks correct again. So perhaps it has been already fixed? It has indeed been fixed. I tracked the bug down to gcc svn revision 126418 (20070706) and the fix to revision 126487 (20070709). Best wishes, -- Martin Orr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Martin Orr <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Martin Orr <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.22 released
- Prev by Date: new 2.6.22-git5 warnings
- Next by Date: [BUG] AS io-scheduler.
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- Index(es):