On 11/07/07 19:01, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Can you do > > make arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.s > > with both compilers, and post the results somewhere? It's probably going > to be so large, and have so many trivial differences (register allocation > etc) that it will be hard-to-impossible to see the problem, but at least > we can *try* to see if it might be obvious enough from comparing the > assembly.. OK, they are at: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~mpo25/2007/linux-signal/ -- Martin Orr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- References:
- Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Stefano Rivoir <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Martin Orr <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Linux 2.6.22 released
- Prev by Date: [2.6.23 PATCH 10/18] dm raid1: clear region outside spinlock
- Next by Date: [2.6.23 PATCH 11/18] dm: disable barriers
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- Next by thread: Re: Linux 2.6.22 released
- Index(es):