Re: [RFC/PATCH] Use mmu_gather for fork() instead of flush_tlb_mm()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 17:39 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:


Would it be better off to start off with a new API for this? The
mmu gather I think is traditionally entirely for dealing with
page removal...


It would be weird because the new API would mostly duplicate this one,
and we would end up with duplicated hooks..

They could just #define one to the other though, there are only a small
number of them. Is there a downside to not making them distinct? i386
for example probably would just keep doing a tlb flush for fork and not
want to worry about touching the tlb gather stuff.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux