Re: removing flush_tlb_mm as a generic hook ?

On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 13:47 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi folks !
> 
> While toying around with various MM callbacks, I found out that
> flush_tlb_mm() as a generic hook provided by the archs has been mostly
> obsoleted by the mmu_gather stuff.

And since life is always better with patches... here are two that
do fork and proc/fs/task_mmu. There should be an improvement on archs
like hash-table based ppc32 where flush_tlb_mm() currently has to walk
the page tables, which means an additional walk pass in fork. With this
patch, there will be only one pass, and it will only hit the pages that
have actually been marked RO.

I need to do some proper testing, but in copy to this, I'm posting the
patches anyway for review / comments.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [RFC/PATCH] Use mmu_gather for /proc stuff instead of flush_tlb_mm()
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
  • [RFC/PATCH] Use mmu_gather for fork() instead of flush_tlb_mm()
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • removing flush_tlb_mm as a generic hook ?
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/16] Pid namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] kvm-scheduler integration
• Previous by thread: removing flush_tlb_mm as a generic hook ?
• Next by thread: [RFC/PATCH] Use mmu_gather for fork() instead of flush_tlb_mm()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]