> It will be solved differently longer term, but short term the fix
> was still needed. There are limits on what can be done late
> in the release cycle so simple patches win.
>
> Besides none of the "NAK"s were particularly inspired in my opinion;
> there were no clear technical objections brought forward.
There were a considerable number of sensible logical objections. You just
didn't agree with them. You've now effectively made .22 unsupportable
since we don't know if someone has binary virtualiser crap loaded.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
