Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs

On Wednesday, June 27, 2007 9:00:33 Pim Zandbergen wrote:
> Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Yeah, you're right I should use an unsigned format string.  Pim, if
> > you change it to %lu does the printk in your dmesg look better?
>
> Er, no.
>
> **** MTRRs don't cover all of memory, trimmed 18446744073709486080
> pages

It looks like end_pfn might be ~0UL now... can you print that out in 
your configuration?

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Pim Zandbergen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
    • From: Pim Zandbergen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [md-accel PATCH 03/19] xor: make 'xor_blocks' a library routine for use with async_tx
• Next by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]