Jesse Barnes wrote:
Yeah, you're right I should use an unsigned format string. Pim, if you change it to %lu does the printk in your dmesg look better?
Er, no. **** MTRRs don't cover all of memory, trimmed 18446744073709486080 pages Thanks, Pim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- References:
- [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- From: Pim Zandbergen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- From: "Mauro Giachero" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/3] MAP_NOZERO - implement sys_brk2()
- Next by Date: Re: Linux Kernel include files
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- Index(es):
 |