On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 09:26:28PM +0900, Neil Booth wrote: > DR 312 clarified the meaning of "known constant size" > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_312.htm > > in the sensible way, thankfully, so your example is actually invalid. <looks> Aha. OK... I'd say that 6.7.5.2[4] should simply have "element type is not a variable length array" instead, regardless of clarification of "known constant size", since element type is not allowed to be incomplete in any case. Would be more readable... But yes, clarification makes sense anyway. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Neil Booth <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Neil Booth <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Neil Booth <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/3] MAP_NOZERO - implement sys_brk2()
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] fsblock
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Index(es):