Al Viro wrote:- > > sparse simply doesn't check that. We don't have anything resembling > support of VLA. Note that check for integer constant expression > has nothing to do with that; > > int x[(int)(0.6 + 0.6)]; > > is valid (if stupid). It isn't valid; it fails the test twice. Both 0.6 are not "immediate operands of casts". Their sum is, but that's irrelevant. Therefore the dimension is not an ICE and a diagnostic is required. Neil. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] fsblock
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Index(es):
![]() |