On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Al Viro wrote: > > Why? I'd say it's not better than BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() use > instead of that ?: Oh, _that_ part I have no problem with. It's more that it seems that the gcc optimization is ok at least as an extension. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ?
- Next by Date: Re: Scaling Max IP address limitation
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 16/16] fix handling of integer constant expressions
- Index(es):
 |