On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:34:48 +0200 Bj__rn Steinbrink <[email protected]> wrote: > The performance counter allocator relies on the nmi watchdog being > probed, so we have to do that even if the watchdog is not enabled. > So... what's the status of this lot? I've just merged this patch and the second one: Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel PerfMon NMI watchdog Message-ID: <[email protected]> but there was no followup discussion afaict. Andi, Stephane: acks? If acked, do we agree that this is 2.6.22 material? Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] Separate performance counter reservation from nmi watchdog
- From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog
- From: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
- Re: [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog
- From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog
- From: Björn Steinbrink <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Separate performance counter reservation from nmi watchdog
- Prev by Date: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
- Next by Date: [Fwd: Re: libata and legacy ide pcmcia failure]
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Always probe the NMI watchdog
- Index(es):
 |