Re: [perfmon] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Separate the performance counter allocation from the LAPIC NMI watchdog

[Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>]

Andi,

On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2007 12:35:56 Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > The performance counter allocator is tied to the LAPIC NMI watchdog,
> 
> That's not true. It's completely independent. It just happens to be in
> the same file, but it has no direct functional ties to the watchdog.
> 
I agree with you that the allocator is functionally independent of the
watchdog. That is how I'd like to see it and I think we all agree on
that.

Yet in the current implementation, there is a link between the two which
causes the issues I ran into. If you look at:

static inline unsigned int nmi_evntsel_msr_to_bit(unsigned int msr)
{
        return wd_ops ? msr - wd_ops->evntsel : 0;
}

int reserve_evntsel_nmi(unsigned int msr)
{
        unsigned int counter;

        counter = nmi_evntsel_msr_to_bit(msr);
        BUG_ON(counter > NMI_MAX_COUNTER_BITS);
	....
}

You see that if the wd_ops (a watchdog structure) is not initialized
then the allocator collapses all MSRs onto one bit.

Once this is fixed (which is what Bjorn did), then I will agree with you.
For this, the allocator needs to be able to probe the CPU and initialize
its own data structures.

-- 
-Stephane
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/