> > queue ? You are overestimating IDE ;) > > He's not -- there is queued commands support since ATA[PI]-5. I'm not sure > why but Linux decided not to support it. Almost no hardware supports it and the functionality is really really ugly to use when it works at all - NCQ is rather more elegant. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: [email protected] (Linas Vepstas)
- Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: [email protected] (Linas Vepstas)
- Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: [email protected] (Linas Vepstas)
- Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- From: Sergei Shtylyov <[email protected]>
- [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- Prev by Date: Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel?
- Next by Date: Re: NFS Oops 2.6.20.14
- Previous by thread: Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- Next by thread: Re: [BUG] ide dma_timer_expiry, then hard lockup
- Index(es):
 |