Alan Cox wrote:
You've made an important mistake. You said "their system". Now its "our
code" and "whoever bought the units' hardware" so it isn't their anything.
Yes, the hardware belongs to the user, and the software belongs to the Linux
community. However I think I wasn't 100% clear, I also mean keeping companies
networks and content secured. Credit card companies insuring the software
hasn't been modified to skim cards (not that it's the only way to skim a card),
If credit card companies are doing this they are failing badly and it
clearly isn't working. Also lets be clear about this - I don't need any
credit card company network access to skim older cards, and the newer
ones have been broken by various non software schemes.
Agreed. Credit card companies are failing very badly at preventing skimming.
They definitely need to rethink their model of how the credit card system should
work.
or Tivo making sure that their content providers are protected. Lets look at
the credit card example. Sure the user could modify the system and boot their
own kernel, but it doesn't have to play nice with Mastercard's network anymore.
Or better yet, would actually report that a certain business's card reader had
been tampered with.
That to me is a fair comment. I should IMHO be able to load my code and
my keys on my Tivo. And Walt Disney in return probably should be quite
free not to trust my keys. You need some fairly strong competition law
enforcement to make all that work right in the marketplace but as a
philosophical basis it seems fine. In practice it is likely to lead to
serious monopoly abuse problems and all sorts of ugly tying of goods that
you don't want in a free market. Given the completely ineffectual way the
US enforces its anti-monopoly law, and the slowness of the EU at it the
results might well be bad - but for other reasons.
I agree as well, the model could be heavily abused. I'm not sure what the
solution is as far as fighting monopolies and corporate greed. But I'd rather
that it was fought through education of consumers and not with a license
agreement that should be giving people freedom. A balance of freedom to the
licensee and the licenser. It's my opinion that GPLv3 potentially shifts the
balance too far to the licensee.
Andrew McKay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
