Re: [AGPGART] intel_agp: use table for device probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 04:49:04PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> That's pretty bad corruption indeed.  What I'm puzzling over though
> is why other 965G users aren't seeing the same thing.
> My own 965G seems to be fine, though that's using Intel graphics
> instead of nvidia.
> 
> (Just to rule it out, I'm assuming at this stage in boot that the
>  nvidia driver module has never been loaded?)

Doesn't even exist for that kernel. I only compiled a new
nvidia driver module for one kernel - the one that I am using
on a daily basis.

> And if you never load the agpgart modules, you never see lockups?

What would the name be of such module?

In fact, I think that when the kernel does NOT lockup, it
doesn't print this "agpgart: Detected.." line either.

Ie, the dmesg of cf68676222e54cd0a31efd968da00e65f9a0963f
which boots fine, gives:

$ grep Detected dmesg-cf686
time.c: Detected 2666.669 MHz processor.
Detected 16.666 MHz APIC timer.

$ grep agpgart dmesg-cf686
Linux agpgart interface v0.102 (c) Dave Jones


Does that give an indication of what you want me to test/try?

-- 
Carlo Wood <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux