Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



you argue that it is evil for tivo to produce a pice of hardware that they can modify and the user can't

but you then argue that it's a good thing for the FSF to produce a license that they can modify and others can't

in the first case tivo is limiting their hardware, releases all the source for the software under the license, and makes it very clear that this is the case before anyone buys a box.

in the second case the FSF is trying to convince everyone that anyone who produced code under the fist license, but didn't give the FSF the ability to relicense their code to whatever the FSF wants are misguided fools who just don't understand what they are doing.

I for one see what tivo is doing as being much less evil then what the FSF is doing.

David Lang

On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:07:00 -0300
From: Alexandre Oliva <[email protected]>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
Cc: Gabor Czigola <[email protected]>, lkml <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

On Jun 17, 2007, Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]> wrote:

On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 15:55 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, "Gabor Czigola" <[email protected]> wrote:

I wonder why the linux kernel development community couldn't propose
an own GPL draft (say v2.2) that is "as free as v2" and that includes
some ideas (from v3) that are considered as good (free, innovative, in
the spirit of whatever etc.) by the majority of the kernel developers.

For one, because the text of the GPL is copyrighted by the FSF, and
licensed without permission for modification.  And that's as it should
be, you don't want others to modify the terms of the license you chose
for your code, do you?

That's probably precisely the reason for removing the "or later" so that
others (even if it's "only" the FSF) can't modify the terms of the
license chosen for the code.

Yes, if you don't trust the organization entitled to publish revised
versions to abide by its commitment to abide by a similar spirit, or
if that spirit does not reflect your intent as a copyright holder,
this are all rational reasons to remove the "or later", indeed (at
least as much as distrust can be regarded as rational, that is ;-)


However, as Ingo argued, not being able to patch holes, fix bugs and
add new features is a very bad idea.  He was talking about the
software, but this is as true when it comes to the license.

There are smarter ways of retaining control over licensing terms that
don't paint yourself into a corner that's nearly impossible to get out
of.

For example, the license provisions could state "or any later version
that CONDITION", where CONDITION reflects your intent as a copyright
holder, or it could state "or any other license that CONDITION."

They could also appoint a committee, or rules for formation of a
committee, to make this sort of decisions on behalf of all the
copyright holders involved.

Of course, since these are in fact all additional permissions, anyone
could take them out, or rather elect not to offer this option for
their own contributions (and then you might end up refraining from
merging them).

The mechanics are no different from "or any later version" provisions,
really, except that then you establish what the goals of your
community are without blocking upgrades that wouldn't conflict, but
that would rather further the interests of your own community.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux