Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



H. Peter Anvin wrote:
William Lee Irwin III wrote:

Robert P. J. Day wrote:

although it's not clear where in the source tree are the invocations
that would actually make a difference to a MIPS system, which is why
i've CC'ed ralf on this.  i'm sure he can clear this up. :-)

On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:32:29AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

x86 could also benefit from coloured zeropages.  In fact, I thought it
already had them (K8 wants as many as 8.)

How would one demonstrate the beneficial effect of such?


Dean Gaudet at Transmeta did some benchmarking using SPEC.  If I recall
his numbers correctly (this is from memory, mind you) on Transmeta
Efficeon, which has 2-way virtual cache tagging with hardware recovery,
zeropage coloring was a 1.5% performance improvement.

I'm surprised that the benchmark made such use of zero pages so as to
be worthwhile. I'm sitting on a patch which removes the zero page from
the page fault fastpath completely which I'd like to try out in -mm...

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux