Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > and once again, an initially innocuous question quickly leaves me > behind. no, no, i'm getting used to it. :-P > This is what happens when you stir the muck on the bottom. This is probably a good thing. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
- why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Re: 4Gb ram not showing up
- Next by Date: Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching
- Previous by thread: Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- Next by thread: Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?
- Index(es):
 |