Re: why does the macro "ZERO_PAGE" take an argument?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:53:08AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> > > > MIPS?
> > >
> > > argh. that would be the *one* definition whose output got chopped
> > > because of line continuation, and it would be only one that actually
> > > uses the argument:
> > >
> > > #define ZERO_PAGE(vaddr) \
> > >         (virt_to_page((void *)(empty_zero_page + (((unsigned long)(vaddr)) &
> > > zero_page_mask))))
> > >
> > >
> > > but it still leaves the question -- if ZERO_PAGE is meant to represent
> > > a single, global shared page that is always zero, why would it *ever*
> > > need to take an argument?  and what's so special about MIPS that it
> > > differs from all the rest?
> >
> > The comment above empty_zero_page and zero_page_mask
> > declarations at arch/mips/mm/init.c:508 sheds light on this ...
> 
> well, it *sort of* does.  at line 64 of that file:
> 
> /*
>  * We have up to 8 empty zeroed pages so we can map one of the right colour
>  * when needed.  This is necessary only on R4000 / R4400 SC and MC versions
>  * where we have to avoid VCED / VECI exceptions for good performance at
>  * any price.  Since page is never written to after the initialization we
>  * don't have to care about aliases on other CPUs.
>  */
> 
> although it's not clear where in the source tree are the invocations
> that would actually make a difference to a MIPS system, which is why
> i've CC'ed ralf on this.  i'm sure he can clear this up. :-)

Cache aliases.  When the same page of physical memory is mapped twice to
user space, let's say at address addr and addr + PAGE_SIZE this is normally
harmless although wasteful on processors with virtually indexed caches as
long as the page is mapped read-only such as in case of ZERO_PAGE.

If the same thing happens with a writable page there is the chance of
severe data corruption.  Some members of the R4000 family are now trying
to be helpful by throwing the kernel a "virtual coherency" exception.  The
bad news about this exception is there might be thousands (the theoretical
worst case would be millions) of it in a single second, so servicing can be
very expensive.  For the ZERO page this can be avoided by using several
pages mapped in a way such that their addresses don't conflict.

  Ralf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux