On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote: > > We should probably make the minimum slab size dependent on > > ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN. There is no point in having smaller slabs anyways. > > They will all have the same size. > > Sounds reasonable to me. Trouble is that ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is in bytes whereas we would need a shift value for KMALLOC_MIN_SHIFT. Does the latest patch work?
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- References:
- kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
- Previous by thread: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- Next by thread: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- Index(es):
 |