Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!

On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Håvard Skinnemoen wrote:

> > We should probably make the minimum slab size dependent on
> > ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN. There is no point in having smaller slabs anyways.
> > They will all have the same size.
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me.

Trouble is that ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is in bytes whereas we would need a 
shift value for KMALLOC_MIN_SHIFT.

Does the latest patch work?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>

References:
- kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
  - From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
Previous by thread: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
Next by thread: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]