On 6/11/07, Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
Trouble is that ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN is in bytes whereas we would need a shift value for KMALLOC_MIN_SHIFT.
Ah, of course. Hrm...I just thought I had an idea, but it wouldn't work...
Does the latest patch work?
I'm sorry, but I haven't tested it yet. My board needs a hard reset, and I can't do that over VPN. I'll test it first thing in the morning. Håvard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- References:
- kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: "Håvard Skinnemoen" <[email protected]>
- Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] [CRYPTO] Add optimized SHA-1 implementation for x86_64
- Next by Date: [PATCH for -rc] kbuild: fix sh64 section mismatch problems
- Previous by thread: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- Next by thread: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- Index(es):
 |