*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(r) Pro* Jeff Dike wrote:
I don't really like this section though. The casting I have now isn't pleasant, but I don't like adding a new global to get rid of it.diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c index 542c9ef..02d132e 100644 --- a/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c +++ b/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c @@ -74,12 +74,11 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(mconsole_work, mc_work_proc);static irqreturn_t mconsole_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id){ - /* long to avoid size mismatch warnings from gcc */ - long fd; + int fd; struct mconsole_entry *new; static struct mc_request req; /* that's OK */- fd = (long) dev_id;+ fd = *((int *) dev_id); while (mconsole_get_request(fd, &req)){ if(req.cmd->context == MCONSOLE_INTR) (*req.cmd->handler)(&req); @@ -798,10 +797,10 @@ void mconsole_stack(struct mc_request *req) */ static char *notify_socket = NULL;+static int sock;+ static int mconsole_init(void) { - /* long to avoid size mismatch warnings from gcc */ - long sock; int err; char file[256];@@ -818,7 +817,7 @@ static int mconsole_init(void) err = um_request_irq(MCONSOLE_IRQ, sock, IRQ_READ, mconsole_interrupt,IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM, - "mconsole", (void *)sock); + "mconsole", &sock); if (err){ printk("Failed to get IRQ for management console\n"); return(1);Jeff
No offense, but this is an ugly hack. What if sizeof(int) != sizeof(long)? You're calling glibc functions with that fd as a parameter. On some arches, compiling will issue warnings or simply fail.
An alternative would be to use kmalloc instead of a global static variable. Do you like this one more?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- From: Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Add group fairness to CFS - v1
- Next by Date: Re: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3689!
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- Index(es):