On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:26:07PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > If you don't think we should be bound by POSIX, then you are perfectly > free to go off and write your own research kernel with whatever > interface you want, and no programs available to run on it. :) This isn't fair to research kernels. Breaking applications is not an active area of research. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Davide Libenzi <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Prev by Date: Re: XFS internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2) at line 2087 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xc01b00bd
- Next by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] KVM - Fix rmode_tss_base declaration
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2
- Index(es):