On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:40:14PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Yes. Files with the CLOFORK and CLOEXEC flag do not count for fork and
> exec copies.
> I was also planning on doing it in __put_unused_fd(), every time
> fmap->count goes to zero. But get_random_int() is not as cheap as I
> thought. If we use a cheaper (although less secure) function to mix pid &
> jiffies, we could do it even in there.
Um, how cheap do you need it? get_random_int() is actually pretty
cheep, since it was designed to be usable by the networking stack for
sequence numbers for TCP packets; and it's not like sys_close() or
sys_open() is a majorly critical path, is it? If the concern is
increasing the potential hold time, I suppose you could have the
exactly two callers of __put_unused_fd() (sys_close() and
put_unused_fd()) call get_random_int() before grabbing the
current->files->file_lock spinlock,
- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
