Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used

On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:15:17 +0100
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 22:55 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Umm if your struct termios has the c_ispeed/c_ospeed fields then you
> > don't need to add the new ioctls to the PPC either - the Alpha is the
> > same here. 
> 
> Well, OK -- if it only involves editing patch files I might _send_ a
> patch tonight but I'll _test_ it in the morning... I think we only need
> this one hunk of what I sent before.

If it doesn't only involve editing the header files for this case (and
maybe needing a define to indicate old==new) then the tty layer wants
fixing to sort that out. Its on my todo list.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] ARM/ARM26: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Re: Linux v2.6.22-rc3
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] trim memory not covered by WB MTRRs
• Previous by thread: Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
• Next by thread: Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]