On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 14:41 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Most people copied the x86 behaviour which makes it easy to transplant.
> Some are just smoking something (see ioctls.h for sh-64 and weep), others
> have slightly odd behaviour for historical compatibility reasons (Sparc)
Likewise, I assume the lack of IBSHIFT on PowerPC is because of AIX?
> > Presumably this is because of the mess in tty_termios_encode_baud_rate
> > when we fix its bogus assumptions about IBSHIFT always being defined?
>
> It's not a bogus assumption. The current code supports
>
> - The old way
> - BOTHER and IBSHIFT
>
> When PPC wants to do arbitary baud rate it needs to resolve both of the
> definitions together. IBSHIFT is simply the shift you apply to the baud
> bits to get the input baud bits.
Why bother introducing new IBSHIFT stuff when it can be declared
obsolete already -- if you want different input and output baud rates,
just set BOTHER and have different values c_ispeed and c_ospeed.
That's what my patch attempts. It builds but I haven't actually tested
it. Why do you say it won't work?
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]