On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 16:03 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Yep - and there are some other changes needed as well once everyone > gets their ports properly lined up (notably handing back the actual > speed). Yeah, probably. This was was required just to get the speed thing to pass basic testing though. You earlier made a cryptic comment about asm-generic and said the PowerPC patch wouldn't work -- I didn't understand, and it doesn't seem to be empirically confirmed. Can you eludicate? -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] ARM/ARM26: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] $ARCH: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
- From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] ARM/ARM26: Enable arbitary speed tty ioctls and split input/output speed
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Performance Stats: Kernel patch
- Next by Date: [PATCH] spi_mpc83xx.c underclocking hotfix
- Previous by thread: Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
- Next by thread: Re: [SERIAL] Don't optimise away baud rate changes when BOTHER is used
- Index(es):
 |