Re: [patch] cpusets: do not allow TIF_MEMDIE tasks to allocate globally

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If that fails, we can't allocate elsewhere because then we have taken 
> exclusive memory from other applications and is contrary to the definition 
> of mem_exclusive. 

Well, I can't speak to the 'real' meaning of TIF_MEMDIE with authority,
but I can speak to the meaning of cpuset flags.

The mem_exclusive flag doesn't mean this.

It means that you cannot overlap the memory of a sibling cpuset.

You will, necessarily, still overlap the memory of your ancestor cpusets.

Whether or not you make any use of the mem_exclusive flag, you still
get the same (limited) guarantees of memory usage -- namely that your
memory won't be used by tasks in non-overlapping cpusets, with some
exceptions, such as:
 1) memory handed out to interrupt code,
 2) memory handed out for GFP_ATOMIC requests, and
 3) tasks marked PF_EXITING -- will soon free up memory

Tasks in cpusets ancestor to your tasks cpuset can always, easily,
use memory on the same nodes your task is on.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux