On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I'm about to dive into some heads-down RHEL backporting (whee), so I cannot
> look at the code in depth this weekend, but here are my basic thoughts:
>
> * We knew there would be fallout from the new reset-sequence code, and this is
> clearly in that category.
>
> * It worked before #reset-seq merge AFAICT, which implies the old method of
> probing -- which included SRST -- worked.
Well, I don't think it really "worked" before. It apparently always had a
bad 30-second timeout (probably because the reset just didn't work at
all). It's just that the old code didn't care, and since the identify then
worked, it was all good.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
