> I think the perform backend for oprofile is the right way to go.
> I'd even go further and say we should merge the perfom backend with
> oprofile as the only user first, because a) the current perfom user
> interface is a complete mess
Can you suggest concrete criticism/improvements/alternative proposals to
Stephane then?
> and can't be merged as-is and b) that
> ensures the oprofile backend works perfectly and we can kill some
> existing code in exchange.
Hmm, but at least for oprofile like functionality oprofile code seems
much simpler. And it's not really bad code. I assume the user interface
would change too. I think it's better to let them coexist for some time.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
