On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:28:28PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I would prefer if oprofile would still work. It doesn't need to work
> in parallel but it should be possible to use it when perfmon
> is not active, but compiled in. That shouldn't be that difficult,
> should it?
I think the perform backend for oprofile is the right way to go.
I'd even go further and say we should merge the perfom backend with
oprofile as the only user first, because a) the current perfom user
interface is a complete mess and can't be merged as-is and b) that
ensures the oprofile backend works perfectly and we can kill some
existing code in exchange.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
