On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:42:41 -0700, Roland Dreier <[email protected]> wrote: > If I just see > > for (pos = list_entry((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member), > n = list_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); > &pos->member != (head); > pos = n, n = list_entry(n->member.next, typeof(*n), member)) > > then what am I to think? You won't catch me writing this kind of crap, so the question is moot. Seriously, a comma operator? Admit it, you just expanded a marcro from list.h by hand. Real people cannot write like that. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- References:
- [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: "Satyam Sharma" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.
- Next by Date: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:385
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/ub.c: use list_for_each_entry()
- Index(es):