Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/3] PM: Disable _request_firmware before hibernation/suspend

[Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@cam.ac.uk>]

On 28 May 2007, at 13:01, Kay Sievers wrote:

> In our development model, users of an interface are expected to  
> improve
> it, because nobody else really knows what's needed. That unfortunately
> didn't happen so far.

Thanks for responding :)

The fact that no-one is told to use the new right way (tm) in any  
available documentation does not help matters improve. One issue is  
that the 'asynchronous' interface seems to rely on the same 'dodgy'  
timeout mechanism as the original request_firmware() call... Looks  
like the lack of a maintainer should be the opportunity for a rework  
of this API.

Michael-Luke Jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/