Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/3] PM: Disable _request_firmware before hibernation/suspend

[Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@cam.ac.uk>]

On 28 May 2007, at 08:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > Seems, that's just the broken synchronous firmware loading interface
> > with the useless timeout handling. The nowait version of the same  
> > loader
> > doesn't time out, and should not have that problem. The sync version
> > should be removed from the kernel, it just causes all sorts of  
> > problems
> > since it exists.
> >
> > Userspace should handle the async request just fine when it comes  
> > back
> > running, regardless of the time it was submitted.
>
> Okay, so the solution is to convert the drivers to use
> request_firmware_nowait() instead of request_firmware() in  
> their .resume()
> routines.

[added Rob Landley to CC]

I think asynchronous loading should be made the default behaviour.  
However, we need to think and document how to do firmware loading.

Firmware loading can be done at two different times:
Device Driver Load
First use of Device Driver

For a network device, this correlates to when the driver is first  
loaded into memory or at 'ifconfig up' respectively.

At device driver load, firmware loading must be asynchronous. This is  
because device driver init can occur before userspace runs and  
registers a hotplug/uevent event handler. If device use is attempted  
before firmware loads, a -ENOFIRMWARE call would be great so that  
userspace and thus the user can be clearly informed what the problem is.

However, at 'first use' firmware loading, the synchronous interface  
should remain. 'ifconfig up' either works or it doesn't, and as I see  
it, has to just hang around until firmware turns up.

One more thing, it seems that the asynchronous firmware loading  
thread just spawns a _request_firmware() call which then times out at  
60 seconds. I think, if the first request fails it spawns another. 60  
seconds is *far* too long for this type of thing, and this was set at  
10 seconds before the last two kernel releases (which is even a bit  
slow itself). Unfortunately, this appears to a case of quite senior  
kernel developers pushing a bodge upstream rather than fixing the  
underlying issue :( [1] [2]

Documentation for how hotplug/uevent handlers should cope with these  
types of firmware loading is also *strongly* requested, in order for  
lightweight but fully functional implementations to be made.

Documentation > Reference Implementation :)

Michael-Luke

[1] http://tinyurl.com/2colng (git.kernel.org)
[2] http://tinyurl.com/224h54 (redhat bugzilla)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/