On Thu, 24 May 2007 23:41:22 +0100 Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll not send a "rename to unsafe" patch for the LZO core until Andrew > decides whether to drop the unsafe version entirely or not as per your > patch. If he doesn't due to the potential use by the compressed cache > people, I will send that patch. I'd have thought that a 3% performance difference isn't worth worrying about. Especially when reclaiming that 3% costs an additional 500 lines of pretty yukky code. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- References:
- [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: "Nitin Gupta" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
- [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Prev by Date: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Remove a few UMSDOS leftovers
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Index(es):