On Fri, 25 May 2007, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Why the HELL cannot you realize that kernel threads are different? > > Ugh? We are talking about request_firmware() here, right? That's > calling userland helper to load the firmware...? Looks like USER > thread to me. Right. And if we had had the nice old /sbin/hotplug thing, it would all have worked fine - because it would just have done an execve(), and things would be happy. But people screwed that up too, and now udevd is an undebuggable user thread. Shit happens. See my other email about why even user threads can probably not be frozen, and the whole freezer thing is misdesigned. And I repeat: PowerPC had working and stable suspend five _years_ ago, without any of that freezing crud. We should rip it out. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- References:
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Romano Giannetti <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Prev by Date: [PATCH -mm] reiser4: remove lzo compression security hole
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Previous by thread: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Next by thread: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Index(es):