> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Chuck Ebbert
> Envoyé : 21 mai 2007 18:24
>
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
> >> Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release.
> >> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :( ...
> >
> > If only it would fix all of them...
> >
> > Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in
> > 2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before
> > 2.6.21 was released).
>
> Yeah, 2.6.21 seems awfully buggy, and patches to fix many of
> the bugs haven't appeared.
>
> Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...
Hi,
If there is a new stable 2.6.20 / 2.6.21, would it be possible that they both contain also this patch to keep the same behaviour between 2.6.20 -> 2.6.22 kernels regarding paravirt_ops GPL export?
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7
Thnx!
- vin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
