Re: [stable] [patch 00/69] -stable review

* Chuck Ebbert ([email protected]) wrote:
> Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...

Yes, the queue's there, just not ready to go yet.  There's still bits that were 
for sent for to .21 and are applicable to .20 (which I'm wading through ATM).

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/69] -stable review
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Kernel Oops with 2.6.21.1 on an AMD K7 machine
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH]serial: make early_uart to use early_param instead of console_initcall
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
• Next by thread: RE: [patch 00/69] -stable review
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]