Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:16:12 -0700
>> Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.21.2 release.
>> Gee a lot of these are fixing recently-added regressions :(
>> ...
> 
> If only it would fix all of them...
> 
> Michal's list [1] currently contains 51 different regressions in
> 2.6.21 compared to 2.6.20 (12 of them were already reported before
> 2.6.21 was released).

Yeah, 2.6.21 seems awfully buggy, and patches to fix many of the bugs
haven't appeared.

Another 2.6.20 update seems to be in order...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux