On 5/22/07, Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On 5/22/07, Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
>> When I said "The standard and maintainable way (for drivers at least)
>> is..." I didn't mean the example expression, I meant the *direction* in
>> which the example was stating dependencies.
>
> In that case I wish "the points" you make on threads are relevant to them.
My initial reply was on a patch which removed the A-to-B declaration of
dependency.
And if you think you can have the "direction of declaration of
dependencies" the way you like it, and also (1) preserve current
"select"-like behaviour, (2) introduce no build issues, and (3) get rid of
the bogus warnings, then: Patches are welcome. (No, suggestions that
don't work, or not fully applicable to the case at hand in this thread will
NOT do).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
