Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem

On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 19:48 +0900, Komuro wrote:
> The problem is CPU1 receives 38239 interrupt-16
> but CPU0 receives only 15 interrupt-16
> CPU0 should receive more interrupts.
> 
>            CPU0       CPU1       
>   0:         85          0   IO-APIC-edge      timer
>   1:          0        698   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>   6:          0          5   IO-APIC-edge      floppy
>   8:          0          1   IO-APIC-edge      rtc
>   9:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
>  12:          0        114   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
>  14:        369       2281   IO-APIC-edge      ide0
>  15:          0         24   IO-APIC-edge      ide1
>  16:         15      38239   IO-APIC-fasteoi   yenta, pcnet_cs   <<< problem
>  17:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   yenta
> NMI:          0          0 
> LOC:      50548      50547 
> ERR:          0
> MIS:      15503

And how exactly is this related to clock events ?

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
    • From: Komuro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [FW ide-cs] Re: jvc cdrom drive
    • From: Komuro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [FW ide-cs] Re: jvc cdrom drive lockup
    • From: Richard Kennedy <[email protected]>
  • Re: [FW ide-cs] Re: jvc cdrom drive lockup
    • From: "Zhang, Yanmin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [FW ide-cs] Re: jvc cdrom drive lockup
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • [SMP BUG] kernel 2.6.21: irqbalance does not work properly
    • From: Komuro <[email protected]>
  • [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
    • From: Komuro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
    • From: Komuro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sata_sil: Greatly improve DMA support
• Next by Date: Re: [BUG] local_softirq_pending storm
• Previous by thread: Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
• Next by thread: Re: [SMP BUG] [clockevents: i386 drivers patch] introduces irqbalance-does-not-work-properly problem
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]